TheGurkha said:
I just want to know why grown men are complaining about the weight of a marker???!!!
QFT.
I'm not exactly the strongest of guys, and in my old age I sometimes find my incontinence pants to be a little too heavy for me, but I vaguely recall having these things called 'muscles' when I was a lad. Hell, I used to happily run* around with an old-style Shocker Turbo, plus a 1.9l tank full of CO2.
(*I accept that as an old-school back player, all claims of me ever having ran are in fact a breathtakingly scandalous lie on my part, just that 'jog', 'waddle' and 'stagger' don't quite have the same impact
)
It's akin to the talk about recoil. Recoil?! From a paintball marker?!
FFS, go fire a .303 and then come back and talk about recoil!
Getting back on the subject of the Angel One. It was a very nice piece of kit and I really wish I wasn't wasting my money heading off to the States, otherwise I'd definitely be buying a few. After having a look and talking it though with John from LiPS, I can see that it's going to be one of the easiest markers to maintain, and all post-LED Angels weren't exactly that difficult in the first place.
The Angel One does look a lot more idiot-proof, which tends to be the problem for any marker: users do love to fiddle and then blame everybody but themselves when it doesn't work as well afterwards. Being easier to look after should also help WDP ensure that every marker has a greater chance of leaving the factory properly tuned and ready to go out of the box.
As for the comments on looks, that'll always be a personal choice, some will like it, some will not, so there's little point ever debating it.
How well it shoots in the long term remains to be seen. Personally, I think it's going to be a winner, if only because I have a lot of respect and belief in WDP's technical talent. It did feel different in the hand when compared to past Angels, so again some might be unhappy with it, but equally some might now prefer the feel.