Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

An Apology From Cynergy

Syd (NSPL)

NSPL and Pr0to KotH
Aug 30, 2001
2,116
41
73
47
Torquay, UK
www.purepaintball.co.uk
It is with great regret that I must apologise to the Division 1 teams that are due to play Cynergy this weekend out in Belguim as the team will not be attending the event.

Due to numerous last-minute problems we are unable to field enough players to make competing in the event worthwhile or financially viable.

The sad thing about the situation is that we have enough players, but the Millennium roster-lock rules prevent us from finding a solution to these problems and fielding a squad.

We have had many roster changes this season; its been a rocky year. But we do have 16 players and many of those who SHOULD be allowed to play for the team this season, but unfortunately are not.

We are extremely dissapointed with the situation, particularly as promotion to the SPL was still within our grasp before this event. Please understand that we are a highly committed team, training every spare weekend (all weekend) and we have spent thousands upon thousands this season alone - to not play the event is devastating for us. We have done everything possible to resolve the problems and not playing the event was the last thing we wanted. Again, my apologies to everyone who is affected by Cynergy not attending.

I have brought up the roster lock rules in the past and feel I must now once again point out that these rules are simply too harsh and are causing more damage than good. I know of many, many players who can't play Millenniums at the moment because of these rules and it is rediculous; the Millennium are effectively turning away customers with the rule.

It is a sad fact that many players are turned away from playing the biggest and best events in Europe and teams are forced into situations like ours. I wonder if the benefits of these rules outweigh the damage they are doing? I doubt it.

The whole roster situation needs to be looked at again and soon. Some minor changes or a method of appeal to consider remitigating circumstances would make the rules more realistic. Players and teams should not be turned away from playing Millennium events - its madness.

I am not blaming the roster rules as the sole reason for our non-attendance, but they have certainly made a bad situation impossible.

Once again, sorry to everyone who is dissapointed with our no show at the Belguim event.
 

Robbo

Owner of this website
Jul 5, 2001
13,116
2,157
448
London
www.p8ntballer.com
Sid, that's pretty bad news considering you were at least trying to help us (UK) get back to our feet.

The Millennium, just like the NPPL and PSP arranged themselves to get ready for the professionalisation of the game.
The reason?
We all believed TV was around the corner and therefore we needed to organise ourselves in a professional manner.

The locked down league system we employed in the MIllennium wasn't directly because of any prospective TV deal (we didn't and never had one) but because the Board felt they needed to follow suit witht he Yanks and also give some protection to those who had invested in the pro teams.
They also thought they could make money out of the situation by turning the pro spots into marketable entities so it wasn't all altrusim here.

I cannot for the life of me see any commonsense reason as to why they extended that lock to the semis, that was sheer brainlessness in my opinion but they probbaly thought they could earn more money that way.


And now?
The landscape has irrevocably changed and we need to take a long hard look at ourselves and decide what is appropriate not just for the pros but for everybody who pays to play in the MIllennium.

With this in mind, the Board need to go to an event series format, no locks, completely open and we will see as a result, a lot of the Yank teams free to come over and then everybody wins.

Will the board do this?
It's basically up to you guys out there (team and vendor), make enough noise and they will, sitting there with your finger up your ass will get you nowhere...the choice is yours !
 

Magic_8ball

$outh $ide
Sep 24, 2005
2,719
0
61
Probably Licking AL France...
Visit site
Funny really, this is the exact same reason that Redemption aren't playing this event. We've had a rocky season with numerous roster changes, and although we could field a solid 7 man squad for the Belgium event, the rostering rules make that impossible.

My heart goes out to Syd and the Cynergy boys as right now these are the guys who'd been holding it together in the Millennium Series and who had the best shot at promotion into the SPL.

Of the 7 uk teams that have played Div 1 this season (ECI, Cynergy, Storm, Redemption, Quake, Northern Heroes, Evil Saints) as far as I'm aware, only Storm and ECI are playing Belgium!

I definately think that the roster locking needs to be reviewed for next year and I know its an issue thats been raised with the IPPU, I just hope they can sort something out.

All the best to the teams out in Charleroi flying the UK Flag, particularly MK Storm and ECI
 

Syd (NSPL)

NSPL and Pr0to KotH
Aug 30, 2001
2,116
41
73
47
Torquay, UK
www.purepaintball.co.uk
With this in mind, the Board need to go to an event series format, no locks, completely open and we will see as a result, a lot of the Yank teams free to come over and then everybody wins.

Will the board do this?
It's basically up to you guys out there (team and vendor), make enough noise and they will, sitting there with your finger up your ass will get you nowhere...the choice is yours !
I have emailed Barry with an explanation of our situation and my points of view about the current roster lock rules. I firmly believe that this is contributing to the lower team numbers as the season goes on. I would ask all other team owners in similar situations to let the Millennium Series know - if we all speak up, they will be able to see the extent of the problems the rules are causing and then can make an informed decision about any changes.
 

Kevin

MK Storm
Apr 12, 2002
568
1
43
Leeds
www.stormpaintballteam.co.uk
sorry to hear that Syd,
your guys put a lot of effort in playing and reffing to make the SPL and looked like having a good shout at it.

what do you think the teams that make the cut for the spl and who have already put the effort in to get into the locked league will think of abolishing it next year ?

Would just lifting or relaxing the roster lock be a better solution ?

will the format work in an open division with different teams and different amounts of teams each leg ?
 

Syd (NSPL)

NSPL and Pr0to KotH
Aug 30, 2001
2,116
41
73
47
Torquay, UK
www.purepaintball.co.uk
sorry to hear that Syd,
your guys put a lot of effort in playing and reffing to make the SPL and looked like having a good shout at it.

what do you think the teams that make the cut for the spl and who have already put the effort in to get into the locked league will think of abolishing it next year ?

Would just lifting or relaxing the roster lock be a better solution ?

will the format work in an open division with different teams and different amounts of teams each leg ?
Personally, I'm asking for a revision of the roster-lock rules.

The division locks are a seperate issue in my mind and one I'm not really in a state of mind to get involved with at the moment.
 

bmcxn

New Member
Feb 3, 2007
4
0
0
www.team-conxion.de
same reason why we cannot join the belgium-party.....these "roster-lock-after the third tournament-rule" hurt us teams and their (board) business too....so this rule is for what? :rolleyes:
 

Missy-Q

300lb of Chocolate Love
Jul 31, 2007
2,524
1,132
198
Harlem, NY
it comes to something when a team can't keep 5-7 players for an 8 month period.
Pretty ridiculous really.
 

Chicago

New Member
Jan 31, 2005
1,380
0
0
Visit site
it comes to something when a team can't keep 5-7 players for an 8 month period.
Pretty ridiculous really.
I don't think the problem is that they can't keep players for 8 months; the problem is they can't get the same players to show up at every event during those 8 months when the players:

- Have real jobs
- Are not paid to play
- Have to self-finance some portion of their play/travel

Somebody can't get off work, somebody has run out of money, somebody's wife is having a kid, there needs to be a realization that for the majority of these teams playing is in reality an OPTIONAL recreational expense, not a career, and it needs to be treated as such.


Unless I'm mistaken, this isn't an issue of players bouncing from one team to another, it's an issue of whether the players are able to play at all.
 

bmcxn

New Member
Feb 3, 2007
4
0
0
www.team-conxion.de
I don't think the problem is that they can't keep players for 8 months; the problem is they can't get the same players to show up at every event during those 8 months when the players:

- Have real jobs
- Are not paid to play
- Have to self-finance some portion of their play/travel

Somebody can't get off work, somebody has run out of money, somebody's wife is having a kid, there needs to be a realization that for the majority of these teams playing is in reality an OPTIONAL recreational expense, not a career, and it needs to be treated as such.


Unless I'm mistaken, this isn't an issue of players bouncing from one team to another, it's an issue of whether the players are able to play at all.
That's exactly right !