I see, the visible evolution of all other species doesn't apply? Actually, nevermind.
EDIT:This sounds far too condesending and that wasn't my intent. I just think I've had my fill of dicussing religion and creation.
The interesting part for me is historical religion, as in the changes that have been made over the years. I think an extremely poor job has been done managing religious branding. The Christians in particular. Didn't Pope Clementine decide on a change in the bible that immortalised Jesus as the son of God, in order to elevate the Christian faith above the Muslim and Jewish faiths? Once/if you accept this history, as documented, then the Christian religion falls apart for me, because unless you believe that Christ was the actual Son of God, born to a virgin, and that he rose from the dead, then you can't actually be a Christian, right?
I wonder if Clementine had known at the time that this would be a distinction that prevented many from entering this religion, if he would have made that edit?
If you consider that this was a change, and that before the change, Jesus was a mortal 'prophet', its much easier to reconcile the various religions into a cohesive global religion, with one God, and one prophet (with different names in different languages - there were many at the time). This starts making some historical sense.
I have the hardest time with being told I am going to burn in hell for not believing Jesus was a demi-god, knowing that this wasn't even the original message of the Bible. People have run with the brand, during a time of very little education, and now I feel it's time to rationalise. It won't happen, but it should, at least in my opinion.
No offense to all you religious nutball-freaks out there, obviously...