So say you are the parent of a bright young lad who has always acted responsibly in the past. He has taken up paintball and taken you to the field where he plays, introduced you around and shown you how safe our sport is. All he wants for his 16th birthday is a marker and he's your pride and joy so ou buy him one. You are a responsible parent and don't let him use it anywhere but at the field. You even keep it in your bedroom closet which you lock. Now, you feel certain that you have met your obligations as a parent. So one day, your lad, believing, as all intelligent people have the habit of doing, that he is smart enough that he can practice his snap shot without supervision and that to not do it would be to admit that he is a child decides to do just that. As we have stated, he is a bright lad so a locked closet is not a huge obstacle to overcome when one is determined to improve his aim and prove his maturity in one fell swoop. Thus, armed with his marker he heads into the backyard and tucks into the doghouse and promptly begins playing phantom pros across the yard. One of his shots strays from the yard and impacts the windshield of a passing motorist causing said motorist to swerve violently and run over Mrs. Potts who was checking her mail. The young lad is oblivious to this and finishes his play before sneaking the marker back into the closet. The inspector's working the case check this registry of which you are speaking and learn that the youngster is the only one in the area that owns a marker. When confronted with the question of whether he was using it at the time of the incident our young man says yes. He is, after all, not a liar. The question now is, what do you charge the young man with, and how would you hold the parents responsible?