I verdantly believe there are too many risks involved in restoring the death penalty to our judicial system due to mistakes in sentencing over murder cases. In a perfect world where juries and judges were always correct then I would condone the death penalty as killing someone removes any "human rights" that person had and simply removing the freedom of the murderer still affords them the human rights removed from the victim.
On the deterrent value of killing killers, so long as one innocent life is saved because one prospective murderer was deterred then that is enough for me. The deterrent value of a death sentence cannot be calculated as there are no statistcts collated for who hasn't killed someone.
In conclusion I agree with the idea of capital punishment but until the courts are infallible the risk of one innocent person being executed is far to big to allow the death penalty to be reinstated.
On the deterrent value of killing killers, so long as one innocent life is saved because one prospective murderer was deterred then that is enough for me. The deterrent value of a death sentence cannot be calculated as there are no statistcts collated for who hasn't killed someone.
In conclusion I agree with the idea of capital punishment but until the courts are infallible the risk of one innocent person being executed is far to big to allow the death penalty to be reinstated.