To be honest from reading it seems only the deviant logo was removed and that was what raised the questions as to why it was offensive. Had it been the main signiture removed we could have understood, surely a PM warning would be a more efficient way as I am sure Kitty would have removed it. Anyone who has met her knows she has a sick sense of humour but as stated before a quick PM it would have been removed.
As for whiteys pictures you make it out like they are Bad wrong, infact the majority are paintball pics and stuff taken at events, yes there are some cartoon style stuff once you browse past i think page 11 or 12 and to do that you need serious patience, so I think saying "that kind of inappropriate content" may have been a bit harsh.
Just seems there would have been an easier way of doing it without all this fuss.
So was the ban because Its to big? its to pink? or because of the sig or is it the logo saying deviant and having a burlesque woman on it? we kinda need to know as being a team logo it wont just be her getting banned.
As for whiteys pictures you make it out like they are Bad wrong, infact the majority are paintball pics and stuff taken at events, yes there are some cartoon style stuff once you browse past i think page 11 or 12 and to do that you need serious patience, so I think saying "that kind of inappropriate content" may have been a bit harsh.
Just seems there would have been an easier way of doing it without all this fuss.
So was the ban because Its to big? its to pink? or because of the sig or is it the logo saying deviant and having a burlesque woman on it? we kinda need to know as being a team logo it wont just be her getting banned.