Thank you for your reply.
So what is your view of aggression in paintball? People say it's necessary for dominance, but it leads to violence, negativity and decline in our sport. Look how many people sell up and ask why, because they don't enjoy it - why? 'because there's too much 'sh*t' they say. I'd say this is a relevant topic for our sport and it's development? People don't quit other sports because of 'sh!t', when they retire they move onto coaching and managing.
Agg was coined (as far as i know) by HK to mean something that looks 'aggressive', and therefore 'good' for paintball. It's now evolved to mean just good but my question was just that, whether aggression is 'good' for paintball. The title was a play on words, based on 'Agg' which everyone who i saw post before sunday seemed to understand (first post - 'i thought agg was just looking cool'), second post was 8ball with just the kind of reply I was looking for, and when i got back from playing it had gone, I might have to trust you that some sh!t posts descended but it just doesn't seem right to delete an intelligent conversation because a couple of people may have posted silly replies.
Im trying to be extra respectful here Mario because of your 'mod' status, and I don't see any point in making an enemy of someone I hardly know for something this petty, but it's just how it seems to me, with 'it wasn't that good anyway' as a reason. It was an intelligent discussion on the forum, which seems to have been deleted for not much reason, with the next threads down living an easy life; a guy who can't use a ruler to measure a backplate, and the bi-monthly 'paintball on TV thread'