Until a closer link between Sport Paintball and customer or rec exists, Tournament is just an expensive luxury the industry can no longer afford. I guess we'll just have to wait and see who's right in the long term.
I completely agree with that statement - so we don't have to wait
But that is not something that is fixed at tournament level... unless we revert to what competitive paintball was in the early 90s.
As I have been saying for years and years (and in these debates too) - the biggest problem this sport has, is that we are not playing the same game as the entry level customers (or vice versa).
From a marketing standpoint, that is insane.
So, paintball tournaments are a niche, and will continue to be so untill more fields run arena ball games for the base consumer.
If paintball events were put on with the purpose of trade selling to their base consumers and media selling content to the same target group.... it would be big games - or possibly team wargames..... because that IS what the base customer is doing in Europe.
But event so, that would make even less sense in Europe than what we are doing now......
You have to realise that there is a very fundamental difference between European and US paintball here..... in the US, there is a HUGE market for rec players to buy equipment - in Europe there is not.... they rent at the fields..... or they are tournament players (I would guess no more than 1 % fall outside those two categories).
So the companies that support the European events do it for two reasons:
1. To sell to the tounament niche
2. To market themselves to the many tournament players that are involved with descision making at fields around Europe
NONE (not a significant percentage anyway), of the casual visitors at European paintball events buy paintball equipment - they wouldn't know what to do with it! - They buy t-shirts, shorts, casual pants, hats, bags, etc.
So, the notion of changing European events to cater for the "rec crowd" makes very little sense - because they don't go there anyway.
Nick