terror attack

[---{RoB}---]

because it doesnt burn for long enough to weaken steal, or at a high enough temperature for that matter...

yer theres loads of rumers that thermite was used they must have jumped from the plane planted the thermite then continued with the crashing.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=9-ekc-nSQ_A

documentary vid on thermite conspiracy.

 

["nasa"]

Or the cctv footage of a 'plane' hitting the pentagon. Supprisingly after a 747 punched a hole in the side there were no parts of a plane to be found, and the hole made was not big enough for the plane to fit in i.e there should of been bits of it lying around outside the building.

They showed a plane hitting the pentagon on the day then that footage was never seen again.

Something got covered up that day

 

[---{RoB}---]

Covered up or made up

 

[Mario]

Jesus, go and educate yourselves.

All those who subscribe to conspiracy theories, your ripe for BOTW.

 

[stongle]

Jesus, go and educate yourselves.

All those who subscribe to conspiracy theories, your ripe for BOTW.

Awwwwww, you beat me to it. Ban of the month more like.

To the idiot who thinks that the steel supports needed to melt for the building to collapse, your' a clase one buffoon. Steel looses 50% of it's structural rigidity at approx 1000f. Since jet fuel burns above this, it undoubtly weakened the steel supports of the building and giving the impact was some 30-40 levels below the top, how much weight do you think is that?

Furthermore jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning. Office building, full of paper and other sh*t, no?

Oh and finally, the lower floor explosions were caused by the lift shafts being ruptured by the impact and jet fuel and other atomised combustables falling through the building. There was explosive blowouts on lowerfloors abd falling lifts etc etc.

As far Iraq, waaaaaayyyy too complicated for forum debate.