cheers guys, that qualification could be a problem, but probably not a very big one. hows about filling times though? and since cheapo air bottles have guages on them, do they break easily?
site air instead of co2
- Thread starter Tom37
- Start date
Air is quicker and more simple to fill, although bottles will have to be filled more often. If installed by someone like hpac, they will provide as many fill stations as required. Most air equipped sites have a safe zone / walkon fill station as well as a safe area / punter fill station.
As a site you will be looking at anywhere between 10-20k depending on the type of compressor, number of hpa bottles and type of install required. But then you are basically sellf sufficient in terms of bottle fills.
In terms of public liability, I am fairly sure it will make little difference to cost. Insurance rates are based on risk assessment. Compressed air is statisticly no more dangerous than co2.
The site i work at has had air for a while and you no its the best £8k spent,at the sit we run infernos on 3000psi and we have no probs we top the bottles up after each game, well anything below 2000psi and fill to 3000 at dinner.H-pac installed the systerm and its spot on best thing is to talk to them and theyed tell you what size set up you would need.
