Certainly.
Why encumber yourself with something that physically prevents you from closely checking all sides of a player (esp. in a snake), limits your vision and mobility and only encourages "sideline" reffing.
How does it prevent you doing anything that may be required of a ref, you can do all the checks and signals. It does not limit any mobility and as for encouraging sideline reffing I believe and my experience shows it does the opposite.
If you wear chest protection, arm and knee pads, gloves and good neck/head gear then you already have excellent protection against those players who can't tell the difference between Black/White Stripes and the multi-colours of a players outfit.
Its ok saying wear this and that but after a few hours reffing you really don't want to wear them any longer and they do not protect the areas that always hurt when you are shot.
Players when they start the game have a bit of adrenaline running round their system and that increases the pain threshold so it does not feel as bad, and you play about ten games per day - the refs play about fifty.
Oh, and if shields are such a good idea, how come the NXL/PSP, NPPL and Millennium CPL/SPL and Divisional Refs don't use them?
As for the MS Ulrich thinks they portray paintball as a painful experience so does not like them to be seen.
The NPPL I believe leave the individual refs to decide and the PSP encourage all refs to use a shield and even provide them.
A shield is not just to protect the ref it can be used to stop players getting shot when they are eliminated to stop the possible retaliation (if paintballs don't hurt why do you girls complain about bonus balling) (not you Rosie
) and you can also stop players who are shot playing on by blocking their shots.
Russ