The thing is that lies eventually catch up with you. You always need a brilliant memory with lies, as you have to remember what you have told who and ensure you don't contradict yourself. Of course there is always the issue that the real facts might be provable too.
There are plenty of people around that keep jumping to defend him when what they think they know may actually be part of that web of lies and manipulation of the facts that he is so adept at . The 'someones attacking my wife and kids' angle is one example of the regulars, just as he has stated again recently when no-one has actually done that at all, just repeated what he alleged of Pete Russell.
I have seen a few references where all of this has been dismissed by Tim as 'total lies' or 'utter bull****'.
Well, I have a challenge for any of those people who seriously consider that it is everyone on this thread that is making stuff up.
I will pose a number of questions below that I challenge them to get a simple yes/no answer out of Tim Barnett. I will predict now that either no-one will have the guts to ask him, for fear of derision at having the gall, or they just will not get a straight answer out of him.
So here we go, if you feel up to it then just ask Tim Barnett to answer yes or no to each of these few simple questions, related to assertions made by some of the people posting their stories in this thread:-
1) Is it a lie that the restaurant business that he ran, Kings Hall Restaurant and Carvery Ltd, was forced into liquidation by creditors in January 2009 with liabilities of £153,000?
2) Is it a lie that he then also filed for personal Bankruptcy in Oct 2009?
3) Is it a lie that he was arrested for Conspiracy to supply a Class B drug in July 2005 and received a 12 month Suspended Sentence?
4) Is it a lie that his entry denial to the USA in 2011, wasn't actually because of a fight in Birmingham in 2010, since the charges were dropped due to an uncooperative victim?
There you go. Anyone want to bet on whether there will ever be an answer from him to those questions, so that his 'total lies' assertion can be confirmed on record once and for all?