Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

Camera help

Adamantium

Modfather
Oct 25, 2006
636
21
43
44
London
www.tech4.tv
Hi all

I got myself a dslr the other day. I've wanted to start getting into photography for a while now, and this is it.
I got myself a canon 550d, standard lens kit. My question to the photo-gods is, should I get a uv lens, or a hood or both? And why?, do they both work well for protecting the lens, or will the uv make my pictures not come out so well? I'm mainly taking portrait stuff at the moment and then will move on to landscape etc, once I cracked the basics... May even turn up at some tourneys and take pics instead of play, but for personal use only, not stepping on toes!

Cheers

Ads
 

essx

Active Member
Sep 10, 2006
383
70
38
Essex
The uv lens are the best cheap way to protect an expensive lenses! worth the £7-8 easy!!
 

FPSJoshwaa

The Other Guy
Dec 5, 2010
288
27
48
Wiltshire
yeah a UV filter is a must if your gunna do paintball photgraphy, i would spend a bit on the filter as thats stop direct hit from destroying the lense so i suggest a Hoya UV filter, it'll be made of a thicker better glass than a cheapo £7 one. also a lense hood is a good protection from shots from the sides just gives it a bit f protection. i do some paintball photography here and there and a good protection for the lenses casing is wrap a bandana around it, it stop paint getting in all the ridges and gaps, just a lot easier clean up

hope that helps man

Josh
 

emisnug

"I am Become Death, squeegier of Worlds"
Oct 10, 2011
795
222
78
Middle of bloody Nowhere
Hey everyone - sorry to dig this thread up again

Any tips on protecting the body of the camera? I've dug up an old Nikon D3 (my dad's "old" one), have put everything I need on the lens (UV filter, bandana, etc) - but was wondering what would happen and how to prevent the camera getting shot in the body? Hoping to get in-action shots (i.e. not staying nice and comfy with the marshals)

Cheers

Rob
 

ShaineMali

Member
Sep 17, 2011
84
9
18
wigan
The Nikon D3 was/is an old Pro journalist body, im sure it was water and dustproof. Its a tank and i'd be confident if it took a hit or two. Those things were used in warzones!
 

Tayler D

SHUTTERIMAGES.CO.UK
Jun 26, 2007
221
4
28
London
Hey everyone - sorry to dig this thread up again

Any tips on protecting the body of the camera? I've dug up an old Nikon D3 (my dad's "old" one), have put everything I need on the lens (UV filter, bandana, etc) - but was wondering what would happen and how to prevent the camera getting shot in the body? Hoping to get in-action shots (i.e. not staying nice and comfy with the marshals)

Cheers

Rob
You’ll find the camera body can take hits and not have any damage. The annoying thing however is cleaning the paint off the body, especially when it gets in-between all the buttons and stuff. I use a waterproof cover called a ‘Storm Jacket’ which covers the lens and the body. That way you avoid the camera getting messy and it also ads a little protection too
 

onasilverbike

I'm a country member!
UV/filter use is subjective. Anything you put in front of the lens is going to degrade the image quality to some extent. Each filter has its uses, some effects cannot be recreated in post processing, but each will have a negative effect on ultimate image quality. UV filters are useful outdoors because they cut out the redundant ultraviolet radiation, which cannot be noticed by the human eye, but can be detected by the camera, resulting in a less 'hazy' image. Indoors, at night, or, in certain cases outdoors, they are pretty redundant. As for the protective qualities of filters, many swear by them, slapping a UV/Sky filter on everything and leaving it there. However, as far as impact and breakage go, a filter may do more harm than good. I have had a filter smash through the front element of an expensive L-series white Canon lens in the past, had the filter not been in place, the front element may not have broken. On a top quality lens there should be a degree of dust and water sealing (though this is not always infallible), and it should be kept in mind that if you do have a direct hit that breaks a filter, what you end up with is an abrasive paste of sharp, hard, tiny glass particles in a thick, gloopy, hard to remove, paste of paint. Filters also vary widely in quality, I would avoid the cheap ones, and those on ebay (which may well turn out to be fakes) or suppliers you are not sure of. Some more in-depth info http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?p=9349882#post9349882&postcount=1

A word of caution on cleaning filters, they should be afforded the same respect as the front element of your lens, not just wiped off on your sleeve, unless, of course, you just don't care about the image quality.

Lens hoods, always, almost without exception, not only do they cut out stray light preventing, flaring but they also help protect the end of the lens from accidental damage and deflect indirect hits from paint! Go for the type that fit to the bayonet fitting on the outside of the front of your lens, rather than the type that screw in to the filter thread on the front, if at all possible. Keep them clean as they don't work so well when the anti-reflective inside coating has been covered in old field paint.

Lens (barrel) protection. There are various solutions, if your lens extends under zoom or focusing then you almost definitely want some sort of protection to stop paint getting inside the barrel. Storm Jackets are good, though could be replicated with something like the sleeve or leg of some old waterproofs. Some use Lens Coat or similar neoprene covers, towels, sweat-bands, bandannas etc. I use sports tape on the rubberised parts (stops them getting contaminated with the nitrates from the paint and going white), switches etc, on the body, and a Storm Jacket over the top. Some prefer to run without any, or much at all.

Body protection. I recommend that screens and displays be protected by the self-adhesive film type protectors, the best I found were for phone screens that I then cut to size before fitting to camera bodies. for body protection there are several types available. The silicone skin 'body armour' type, neoprene, proofed nylon and clear plastic, or combinations thereof, all have their plus and minus points. I tend to use Lens Coat clear back body covers and if its really pissing down, I use a second layer of a proofed Wildlife Watching cover over that and the Storm Jacket on the lens.

I haven't found anything really effective in stopping the grained finish of the body getting contaminated by the nitrates in the paint though, or of cleaning up the white mess it eventually leaves, the moral being, if care too much for your equipment (or don't have adequate insurance cover) don't take it on field!
 
  • Like
Reactions: emisnug and essx