Sammy:
You might very well have your personal doubts that it will work in practical terms - but please explain WHY you think that?
What is wrong with the theory behind the decision to lock the Champions League at 16 teams?
Some 6-8 Euro Pro teams will no longer be "Pro" after this season (we might be amongst them) - please explain why sponsors should maintain those teams' budgets, instead of shifting the budget to where the media and spectator attention is?
Please explain how the best European paintball teams get better by perpetuating the current situation where Pro teams play lower ranked teams in half their games, and where anyone who wants to can enter the highest league at a whim.
Please explain why - by making the highest division in Europe a thing of exclusivity - we are shooting ourselves in the foot?
- And no - the "I want to see Dynasty play in Europe" argument does not hold water - because if they wanted to play in Europe, they WOULD have done so this year (besides Paris).... and this change has happened AFTER they have decided not to.... and they have obviously opted to not try and qualify, as have many other US teams.
MY position is: It's about time European paintball stands on its own two feet, instead of trying to cater to the US teams that don't want to make the trip to Europe anyway.
XSV, Arsenal and the Wackers have given it a go - and I salute them for it... the rest I don't really care about.... if they don't want to play Europe, that's fine by me.... the object of European paintball should not be to get a couple of US teams more to go to our events like some paintball version of Oliver Twist, hat in hand, begging..... but instead to develop our own teams in the right direction.
European paintball needs to develop on its own terms - and it's about damn time we take this step!
Nick