http://techpb.com/?p=876
This isn't a particularly new vid but I take great pleasure in watching all the TechPB stuff whilst I'm working up the money to involve myself in the sport. I was kind of surprised to see this video, it seems very self-defeating. Say negativity on the internet is killing the sport whilst posting a video saying the sport is dying on the internet?
I'd really like to know what you guys think though. Is TechPB generally a respected site? Do you think what he's saying has much truth to it? Also, a specific point, do you think ramping ruins the game? I have to admit, as someone who's only played recball and wants to find more out about the sport, when I saw the videos of markers just spewing out balls at 20+ per second? That bit never appealed to me. Not even double triggers particularly appealed to me. It's like aiming is not a part of the game. To some extent I can understand it, as aiming is of interest to the individual, whereas being forced to move under heavy fire is more interesting for you and your team. It looks like a trade off I suppose? Make aiming less significant, make tactical decisions more significant. I'm talking out of my bum though as I have literally zero experience. How do you, in your non-zero experience, feel about the TechPB dude's opinions?
This isn't a particularly new vid but I take great pleasure in watching all the TechPB stuff whilst I'm working up the money to involve myself in the sport. I was kind of surprised to see this video, it seems very self-defeating. Say negativity on the internet is killing the sport whilst posting a video saying the sport is dying on the internet?
I'd really like to know what you guys think though. Is TechPB generally a respected site? Do you think what he's saying has much truth to it? Also, a specific point, do you think ramping ruins the game? I have to admit, as someone who's only played recball and wants to find more out about the sport, when I saw the videos of markers just spewing out balls at 20+ per second? That bit never appealed to me. Not even double triggers particularly appealed to me. It's like aiming is not a part of the game. To some extent I can understand it, as aiming is of interest to the individual, whereas being forced to move under heavy fire is more interesting for you and your team. It looks like a trade off I suppose? Make aiming less significant, make tactical decisions more significant. I'm talking out of my bum though as I have literally zero experience. How do you, in your non-zero experience, feel about the TechPB dude's opinions?