Round Robin or best of three?

[sjt19]

Ok, so half way through the Millennium Series, what are people's opinions on the best of three finals games? The switch from the round robin was made at the beginning of the season, was it a good switch? I will hold my own opinion back till i see what everyone else thinks.

sam

 

[Red_Merkin]

for top division teams yes,
for teams who pay their own paintbill (am b and novice) No.

I believe that best of three does produce the fairest result.

 

[kidzero]

i like best of three, it makes the best team win(mostly) and i really would pay for that.

 

[LARSEN]

The bad thing wit best of 3 is that if you loose you dont get a shot at second.

 

[Twizz ECI]

sam

I dont like it because if you win you dont have to push SO hard on the 2nd game,and may be they should play the games on different fields so it changes the game slightly so both teams have to think rather than going to the same poistions on the same field.

Twizz Team Ecstasy

 

[sjt19]

Totally agree mat, i dont like it either. Playin the same team on the same field gets too repetetive, why not switch fields? I also would like the variety of playing 3 different teams in the finals, makes in more interesting. The team that wins the first of the best of three only has to defend and draw the game to win overall, rather than having both teams playing attacking to get a win in the round robin format.