theres a few of these topics already .. but both are good, rotor is force fed but the spire has a g-force sensor to feed, spire is better for reballs though, batteries last a very long time in both.
I can't comment on the spire, but the rotor that I have been using now for about 2 years has been faultless. No internal breakages, battery life is freakishly long (6 AA batteries in 2 years), easy to clean outside and strong enough to handle anything that I have been stupid enough to do to it.
Quite simply the best hopper I've ever used.
i have no idea about the spire apart from what people have told me, people have said to me that they really like it apart from the fact it isnt a rotor. doesnt have the same feel or battery life. after all though you need to make up your own decisions
i have no idea about the spire apart from what people have told me, people have said to me that they really like it apart from the fact it isnt a rotor. doesnt have the same feel or battery life. after all though you need to make up your own decisions
I'm a rotor fan but tbf the spire is an awesome hopper and the only hopper i have used for reball that has no issues but for usual paint performance wise they are very similar just down to which one you like more but the spire 260 is slightly smaller than a standard rotor swings and roundabouts mate