How about making a requirement that teams entering the professional division of the NPPL have a minimum sponsor portfolio/ budget in addition to the wins needed to promote to the division?
I understand that the NPPL is not overjoyed about teams selling their spots. I see that as their perrogative, given that they earned a spot, but oh well.
Some teams may not be supported enough to make a serious go of a season in pro. Since "professional" implies money as well as skills, would it make sense to require some evidence that a team is on a footing to compete among other professional paintball teams? Getting there is one kind of evidence, and maybe this will all shake out in a couple of years anyhow. This was just a notion I had thinking about salary caps in other sports... paintball might benefit from the opposite sort of limit, a lower reach.
I understand that the NPPL is not overjoyed about teams selling their spots. I see that as their perrogative, given that they earned a spot, but oh well.
Some teams may not be supported enough to make a serious go of a season in pro. Since "professional" implies money as well as skills, would it make sense to require some evidence that a team is on a footing to compete among other professional paintball teams? Getting there is one kind of evidence, and maybe this will all shake out in a couple of years anyhow. This was just a notion I had thinking about salary caps in other sports... paintball might benefit from the opposite sort of limit, a lower reach.