Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

That is soooo gay

niallist

SPS - First 9
Nov 2, 2008
898
212
78
London
Why would they need to out themselves?

Surely the more enlightened people among us don't care what people get up to in the sack. (i currently count you in this category Devrij, i'm not suggesting that you expect this to happen).

and in response to your original post, I (would like) to think we have got to the stage in the Uk where most people are no longer bothered by someones sexuality. in our world it's all about the paintball and that's how it should remain. Black, white, gay, straight, religious, atheist, ginger etcetera etcetera etcetera whatever, pull trigger, shoot fools.

And as for the whinging about the "PC brigade", it's simple, it all comes down to manners. If someone asks you to use a certain term to describe them then what's the problem? I like to be referred to as "that **** over there". The majority of gay people like to be referred to as gay. Simple. That's no great hardship is it?

*post no. 69, fnar fnar*
 

ollgeeze

Elsham eagles frontman 8)
Apr 11, 2005
493
0
26
solihull west mids
Visit site
I dont believe someones sexuality can be influenced by anything except who/what gives said person a boner, last i checked only your natural genetic inclinations can give you one of those :D
 

niallist

SPS - First 9
Nov 2, 2008
898
212
78
London
I dont believe someones sexuality can be influenced by anything except who/what gives said person a boner, last i checked only your natural genetic inclinations can give you one of those :D
How you went from talkiing complete rubbish to that I don't know. But you're right.

Latest research proves it is genetic, i.e. nature not nurture.

You get a cookie.:)
 

niallist

SPS - First 9
Nov 2, 2008
898
212
78
London
good point spangley.

there are some things out there that are beyond comprehension and explanation, that's one of them. I don't think that the kind of thing you are talking about is as basic as the difference between fancying men or women. I think that's where the nurture argument comes in. I have zero evidence to back this up though. I'm guessing now.
 
My argument against that is Apotemnophilia.

I cannot believe that there is any gene that would make some one get erotically aroused by the thought of being an amputee.

Why is it any more surprising than, lets say: a person with a propensity for massive jublies?

Id say given the fact that everyone has a unique personality its suprising most people are within the bounds of what we call normality.
 

spangley_special

Free Agent
Sep 26, 2006
2,810
134
98
Bristol
www.iamjackfranklin.co.uk
No there isn't. But you are talking about a fetish now. Big difference.
You have other points you want shot down in flames?

:p
Considering that many of these fetishists are exclusively aroused by their fetish I dont see how different it is to being gay or straight or what ever.

Whats the difference between only liking women, only liking men or being an amputee? They're all merely targets for our libido, just that some are slighty off haha
 

niallist

SPS - First 9
Nov 2, 2008
898
212
78
London
yeah, but being gay is not a fetish. It's the way your made.

e.g. you can have foot fetishists, but they can be either gay or straight. However being gay or straight is an essential part of your identity before your fetishes come into play.

anyway this is a PG forum (i think) so that's as far as I'm going for now.