As a spectator, it sucked....
After all the hype about moving the event back to Crystal Palace because of this reason or that reason, i think they missed the point on why it was moved from there in the first place. The problem is that the location defines the layout too tightly, leaving little room for positioning more suitable for what was needed.
My main beef was the retarded decision to make the majority of the fields in-accessible to spectators (people without MS ID). When i got there on Saturday i couldn't believe it.... The only field that was decently visible was the (excellent) CPL field... The JT field was too far back from the stands to be watchable not to mention after the wind pulled the netting down was next to impossible to see. The M5 fields on the astro turf could be seen once they opened up the walkway around the top, but this didn't last long before they sealed it off to players only.
I didn't manage to see anything really of the 7man tournament aside from what was played on the Sunday on the CPL field.
I can see the reasons for locking off the lower deck of the stadium to players only, security and what-not... But, why the bloody hell couldn't spectators get round the right hand side and back of the other fields?? It was just stupid. At the NEC they had the right idea by having one side of the fields being accessible to players and the other to spectators, maintaining security and allowing people to watch.
I'm not sure how well the layout worked for players, i suspect it went down quite well. But i really think more thought needs to be given to rest of us.
Personally, i preferred the NEC as a venue. The large open space allowed the organisers to define the layout and not work within as many constraints. Easy road access, a train station and central location with an airport next door made it much better than CP. Yeah yeah, there were issues with the catering being supplied by the NEC and other quibbles but these I feel could have been worked on.
If the NEC is not an option then i feel it would be worth the MS looking into other options for a venue. Something with open space that the organisers can craft into a world class venue. Keep it in the south if you want to maintain that boner you have for London... (yeah i know Esher was a bit of a mess to all the smart asses out there)
Oh, and all this 'Crystal Palace is it's spiritual home' crap, may i point toward the the groans of ambivalence that greeted the MC's question of 'isn't it great to be back at CP?'
After all the hype about moving the event back to Crystal Palace because of this reason or that reason, i think they missed the point on why it was moved from there in the first place. The problem is that the location defines the layout too tightly, leaving little room for positioning more suitable for what was needed.
My main beef was the retarded decision to make the majority of the fields in-accessible to spectators (people without MS ID). When i got there on Saturday i couldn't believe it.... The only field that was decently visible was the (excellent) CPL field... The JT field was too far back from the stands to be watchable not to mention after the wind pulled the netting down was next to impossible to see. The M5 fields on the astro turf could be seen once they opened up the walkway around the top, but this didn't last long before they sealed it off to players only.
I didn't manage to see anything really of the 7man tournament aside from what was played on the Sunday on the CPL field.
I can see the reasons for locking off the lower deck of the stadium to players only, security and what-not... But, why the bloody hell couldn't spectators get round the right hand side and back of the other fields?? It was just stupid. At the NEC they had the right idea by having one side of the fields being accessible to players and the other to spectators, maintaining security and allowing people to watch.
I'm not sure how well the layout worked for players, i suspect it went down quite well. But i really think more thought needs to be given to rest of us.
Personally, i preferred the NEC as a venue. The large open space allowed the organisers to define the layout and not work within as many constraints. Easy road access, a train station and central location with an airport next door made it much better than CP. Yeah yeah, there were issues with the catering being supplied by the NEC and other quibbles but these I feel could have been worked on.
If the NEC is not an option then i feel it would be worth the MS looking into other options for a venue. Something with open space that the organisers can craft into a world class venue. Keep it in the south if you want to maintain that boner you have for London... (yeah i know Esher was a bit of a mess to all the smart asses out there)
Oh, and all this 'Crystal Palace is it's spiritual home' crap, may i point toward the the groans of ambivalence that greeted the MC's question of 'isn't it great to be back at CP?'