Ive read about the contour hd, very nice spec but way to pricey for what im after, im talkin more bog standard. I agree with you 100% though because for me to really be able to watch back games etc i need a decent camera and fps to keep up with the game and to really see wasup but like i said to pricey for me. Im not looking to youtube anything its purely personal reasons, thanks for your input though appreciate itDepends on how much money you've got sloshing around.
In terms of general head-cam footage with the purpose of watching back games, something recorded at 60 frames a second is smoother than something filmed at 29.97, which means you can see more of your action.
For my money, the Contour HD+ or the R7 Replay are good contenders, but pricey. If you fancy it, check out the new Liquid Image Ego. Its about £160ish I think.
Very tempting mate just a little out my price range for what im after, thanks for the thought though, much appreciatedNinjaUK, might just be your day
http://p8ntballer-forums.com/threads/contour-roam-hd-headcam-barrel-cam.150190/
The frame rate does not really let you see more of the game tbh in real time the difference is so minimal. Tbh I shoot video at 24 fps it's the most cinegraphic. 50 or 60 fps is mostly used in order to play video back in slow motion. Ever seem them HK videos? That's why a lot of people now film with DSLRs now. Oh and at 50 fps or more it will most probably be downed to 720p. If you want to know anything feel free to ask. I worked for BBC and ITV. As a broadcast camera man. Also canon. And Jessops .... SighDepends on how much money you've got sloshing around.
In terms of general head-cam footage with the purpose of watching back games, something recorded at 60 frames a second is smoother than something filmed at 29.97, which means you can see more of your action.
For my money, the Contour HD+ or the R7 Replay are good contenders, but pricey. If you fancy it, check out the new Liquid Image Ego. Its about £160ish I think.